fignewton: (humor)
Tuesday, July 25th, 2017 11:51 am
Ahem.

I never mention RL issues here, but...

EEEEEEE I BECAME A GRANDMA FOR THE FIRST TIME YESTERDAY

What an amazing, incredible blessing this is. My new granddaughter is beautiful. My daughter is a trooper. My son-in-law is utterly besotted. Quite frankly, so am I. :D

We now return you to your regularly scheduled SG-1 fannishness.
fignewton: (humor)
Wednesday, February 5th, 2014 05:10 pm
I know there are a lot of you out there! And I'm sure you've already seen this bit of sheer adorableness, but just in case you didn't:

Benedict Cumberbatch and the Sign of Four (or is it Three?)

Sherlock + Sesame Street = JOY.

:)
fignewton: (humor)
Tuesday, July 12th, 2011 12:18 pm
I've tagged this both as not!stargate and stargate sg-1 silliness because it's more about fandom than Stargate itself... :)

This xkcd had me laughing out loud. Especially the alt-text. Check it out and put a smile on your face for the day!
fignewton: (humor)
Wednesday, July 6th, 2011 09:02 am
We interrupt this SG-1 journal to bring you a very important message (especially you, Aelf).

TODAY'S SLUGGY FREELANCE.

Tears of joy in my eyes.

Wheeeeeeeee!!!!

(We now return you to your regularly scheduled SG-1 squee.)
fignewton: (Fig Newton)
Sunday, June 27th, 2010 03:33 pm
Is there any way to strip the musical score out of a DVD so you hear only the dialogue and (bonus if possible) the sound effects?

I assume that there is such a method, if only because I've seen dialogue from eps used in music vids without the accompanying music to clash with the music of the vid itself. I tried Googling and didn't get anywhere.

What I want is a way to take one of my SG-1 DVDs and copy/manipulate an ep or two so I can watch it with dialogue intact, but no music. I'd love to have the sound effects included, but it's more important to have the music removed. Does anyone know how to do this, or where to direct me to find out for myself?

Thanks a lot!
fignewton: (daniel hmmm)
Tuesday, February 16th, 2010 12:19 pm
I prefer to keep RL issues out of this journal, but this certainly touches on fandom issues:

It's 'Mixing,' Not Plagiarism

With the caveat that I can't go back completely to the original sources, since some of it is in German...

What troubles me isn't so much that Hegemann did this -- it's an old, sordid, familiar story. What bothers me is that she insists that it's okay -- and that she hasn't been disqualified as a possible winner for a prize in the Leipzig Book Fair because of it.

"I myself don’t feel it is stealing, because I put all the material into a completely different and unique context and from the outset consistently promoted the fact that none of that is actually by me."

"There’s no such thing as originality anyway, just authenticity."

From what I understand, though, she didn't "promote the fact" from the outset; she didn't admit it until a week or so ago, when she was caught.

The article includes this passage:
Ms. Hegemann finds herself in the middle of a collision -- if not road kill exactly -- between the staid, literary establishment in a country that venerates writers from Goethe to Mann to Grass, and the Berlin youth culture of D.J.’s and artists that sample freely and thereby breathe creativity into old forms.

So since she's "breathing creativity" into someone else's blog posts, it's fine? Integrity in the literary world is "staid" and old-fashioned? Say what?

I am personally astonished at the suggestion that the internet and the speed and process of modern-day communications would legitimize plagiarism. If anything, it makes it much easier for guilty parties to be caught. I will say that "authenticity versus originality" might be a shot across the bow at fanfic, but we don't try to claim Daniel or Jack or Sam or Teal'c as our original creations or try to make a profit from our usage of the characters or settings. And I am saddened at even the hint of a possibility that plagiarism might gain a patina of legitimacy, as long as it's spun into a "different and unique context," as Hegemann claims. Because apparently, it's not just her - the committee for the book prize still has her in the running.

I'm usually willing to give a teenager a little leeway in making mistakes. She has apologized, sort of. But she still claims that her only mistake was failure to cite her sources, rather than lifting phrases and paragraphs from another author/blogger and claiming them as her own; and to me, that means that she hasn't apologized for anything other than being caught.

How would you want this to go, and how do you think it might impact fandom as a whole?

Additional discussion can be found on LJ.