February 2024

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728 29  

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Tuesday, November 18th, 2008 10:15 pm
[livejournal.com profile] redial_the_gate recapped Nemesis today - the final episode of Season Three. When Abyssis first suggested Redial, none of us dreamed it would be such a delightful success. Thank you, fandom, for being so awesome - and my fellow mods, too, who are the best of the best. :)

We start Season Four on December 2nd, but in the meantime, there will be our season's trivia quiz and any leftover S3 meta and the icon challenge for the comm's default icon during S4. But for now, here's a little thinky meta about Nemesis and the choices that SG-1 made.

I want to give full credit where it's due: this was inspired by This Time by [livejournal.com profile] inyron, an interesting quantum mirror fic that introduces us to a Daniel Jackson who lost his team in Nemesis... and didn't get them back, because Solitudes never happened. (Gen, rated PG-13 for language and violence.) The premise is a fascinating one, and while the story is an entertaining adventure in its own right, I'm a little sorry that Inyron didn't choose to explore the effects there would be on a Daniel who got left behind in the worst sense of the word - left behind on the safety of Earth while SG-1 risked their lives, with no way of ever, ever knowing if they survived, and with no way for them to ever return.

When I think about it, though, I find myself increasingly troubled by the scenario, because how dare Jack and Sam and Teal'c hijack the Stargate and leave Earth cut off from the rest of the galaxy, with no way to defend themselves? It's true that Sam and Teal'c beamed up to Thor's ship with the expectation of being picked up by a shuttle - they didn't choose a suicide mission. But does saving four lives (including Thor's) give them the right to deny the Earth the Stargate?

Now, Inyron's AU isn't the same as ours - we do have a second Gate, and Sam knew, when she made the proposal, that Hammond would be able to order the second Stargate shipped to Cheyenne Mountain ASAP. But it's still difficult for me to accept that Jack and Sam, both military to the core, would take the Gate. True, they couldn't have taken the one stored at Area 51 - not only didn't they have time to try and find it, but there certainly wouldn't be time to remove the "permanent iris" welded in front of it! But that doesn't change the stark reality that Sam and Jack and Teal'c were depriving the SGC of their connection to the galaxy, at a time when they knew of terrible dangers out there. To give a single example: What if the plan had failed, and the SGC had needed to evacuate as many humans as they could off-world before the Replicators wiped them out?

Don't get me wrong - I'm very very happy that Sam was able to think under pressure and figure out a way for all four of them to get away to safety. (Thor!) But the moral implications... well. I think it's an interesting topic to discuss.

Anyway, I'm sorry, but that just happens to be the way that I feel about it. What do you think?

Reply

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting