February 2024

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728 29  

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Tuesday, October 16th, 2007 07:31 pm
There was considerable discussion in the comments section of the Sam Carter edition regarding Sam's actual age. If you're interested in reading the details that lead to the final conclusion (the screencap from Entity doesn't work, but Sam is still younger than Daniel), this link will take you directly to the new analysis.

And thanks, Codger. :)
Tuesday, October 16th, 2007 08:27 pm (UTC)
It's quite possible that the military track is different from the medical one. My college experiences are outside the U.S., so I really don't know how things work.

I suspect the bottom line is that the writers didn't think too clearly when they created Sam's stats. That doesn't surprise me for some reason. :) So she has too much accomplished at too young an age, yes - but then again, that's probably par for the course for the SGC. No one there will ever be accused of being normal!
Tuesday, October 16th, 2007 08:39 pm (UTC)
If she weren't military, it would work just fine, but there's structure there that just doesn't give for anyone.

See, one of the biggest beefs I have with her being born in the latter half of the 60s is that I think they'd've run her through grad school right after the academy so as not to risk losing their 'treasure' to some university who'd offer her a full ride instead of whatever grunt work the military put her to instead of grad school.

Oh.

Damn.

I just thought of something.

Remember, she'd had her sights set on NASA? She *had* to have gone to flight school. And I'd be willing to bet that her dad eased her way even if he didn't tell her about it. Flight school's 54 weeks, I think.
Tuesday, October 16th, 2007 08:52 pm (UTC)
I'll give you the structure, as that's Codger's strongest argument for the timeline as he posits it. I don't know about the grad school and everything else; I just know the captain-to-major thing is based on solid canon and AF-fact.

One thing, though: I'd be willing to bet that her dad eased her way even if he didn't tell her about it.

If that's an implication that Sam got an easy ride in any shape or form, I'm going to disagree with you. Very strongly. No woman claws their way through the military because it's easy - and that's talking about today. Fifteen to twenty years ago was exponentially worse.
Tuesday, October 16th, 2007 09:00 pm (UTC)
No, not an easy ride, just that I doubt the AF would have *allowed* someone of her brainpower to be 'wasted' on flight school without someone somewhere saying "C'mon! She can do it and look, she could be an astronaut down the road! Think of the PR!" Not nepotism so much as being willing to argue the point in the right places.

Though I still want to know how she avoided a Board of Inquiry (or whatever it's called in the AF) after First Commandment.
Tuesday, October 16th, 2007 09:02 pm (UTC)
But I don't think they do make exceptions, even for Sam, on going to grad school after. (my experience is Army, not Air Force). And yeah, you've got the gulf war and pilot training too.

But it comes back to how long she's in rank. And she couldn't be born in the early sixties and only become a major in 1999. She'd have been drummed out of the service. Even giving a few months here or there because of canon timeline v. "our" timeline, they've been staying close enough to real life that it can't be much different (and certainly not make her birthdate older than Daniel's).
Tuesday, October 16th, 2007 09:17 pm (UTC)
More than anything else, I think TPTB screwed up royally. :-)
Wednesday, October 17th, 2007 02:16 am (UTC)
Remember, she'd had her sights set on NASA? She *had* to have gone to flight school.

Not necessarily. There's pretty much two ways to become an astronaut - either the pilot track or the science track.

You either need to have so many hours flying military-type air craft (you, I think, can sorta get this not in the military, but it's pretty much impossible) and that'll qualify you for the Commander or Pilot type positions. And most astronauts in this track come from the Navy, rather than the Air Force. (also, it helps to have science or engineering leanings)

If you go the science route you pretty much need a PhD (technically only a masters) and to be, well, awesome. That'll put you in more a Mission Specialist position. In this case, it helps a lot to have some flying background.

So, yes, Sam was set on NASA, but she didn't necessarily need flight school to get there. In fact, she probably would be better off playing to her strengths as a scientist to try to to go the Mission Specialist route (where I think she'd be happier anyway) but having Air Force experience wouldn't hurt and I have firm personal canon that she knows how to fly (private license, glider training, something) but that doesn't mean the Air Force trained her to fly jets.

And, well, if she wanted flight school, I see no reason she couldn't have gotten in without Jacob's help, but that's neither here nor there. Given what we see in eps about the F-302 I don't think she's a trained Air Force jet pilot.
Wednesday, October 17th, 2007 02:26 am (UTC)
Given what we see in eps about the F-302 I don't think she's a trained Air Force jet pilot.

Really? I got the impression from those that she *had* been trained as an Air Force jet pilot (when being the question).

As for astronauts, IIRC, most, if not all, of the military personnel are also pilots, even if they're in there as mission specialists. Is it required? I don't recall. But consider the person who wants to be an astronaut. What are the odds that they'd NOT get pilot training if they could?

Ultimately, TPTB screwed up because we've got a paradox. One the one hand, due to when she got her promotion to major, we can only backtrack so far. But then there's her time in the Gulf and the time it would take for her to have her training and education and her previous postings (that we know of) which all adds up to longer than the time we've been led to believe she was in the Air Force. The simplest explanation for the obvious discrepancy is that she was in grade longer than she should have been for some reason.
Wednesday, October 17th, 2007 03:43 am (UTC)
Really? I got the impression from those that she *had* been trained as an Air Force jet pilot (when being the question).

I just assume since we never (unless I'm forgetting something) see her actually fly an F-302 (she sits second seat with Jack - more the navigator/instrument role while Jack flies) and since she does not have pilot's bars on her dress uniform, she isn't trained to that level. I firmly believe she has some form of flight crew training and knows how to fly (private pilot's license or somesuch) and I think there's a good chance she had some pilot training - but likely only basics (not specializing to fighter jets or something).

It's true, most military personnel who become astronauts are pilots - but that makes sense if you look at the possible tracks. I'm pretty sure it's not all, but I could be wrong (and being pilots could meant very different things - you can be a pilot with jet fighter school, etc). I agree Sam would try to get pilot training but that doesn't mean she did necessarily.

See, though, Codger has shown that the timeline can work - perhaps would take luck and skill to make it happen, but everyone on SG-1 is stretched just to the other side of believability - it's part of what makes them all awesome. Only the best for the flagship team of the SGC and all.
Wednesday, October 17th, 2007 03:54 am (UTC)
One of the issues I have with his timeline is that it A. astrophysics of the 60s is far different from astrophysics in the 80s and B. sad to say, it's going to be far more difficult for a woman to get through the program, NOT because she's less capable or intelligent, but because physics is one of the last bastions of the Good Ol' Boy network in academia. Nowhere is sexism more rampant than in physics. (I work in higher ed and have known many *MANY* physics grad students of various stripes - women get all sorts of lovely roadblocks thrown at them that have nothing to do with their ability and everything to do with their gender.) It's gonna have taken her closer to five years just to get through the crap she'd have to deal with.

As to the missing bars on her uniform. Props again. Don't trust 'em, they lie. Just look at Jack's stars when he was dealing with Prior!Daniel.
Wednesday, October 17th, 2007 04:09 am (UTC)
Oh, believe me I know. The, um, atmosphere, among physicists is one of the reasons I traded my planned physics degree for a chemistry degree instead and, yes, physics can still be really bad in a lot of places (though computer science is really bad too in that respect - possibly worse), particularly with gender issues.

It's possible she lucked out with the right school and the right advisor and enough tenacity and brilliance to pull it off - but I do have trouble believing anything less than 4 years in grad school (and 4 is stretching).

See, props can be funky, yes (Jack's stars) but...if you look for patterns, it works. Sam's uniform never (I believe) has pilot's wings. I'm comfortable considering a consistent prop to be canon evidence.
Wednesday, October 17th, 2007 04:17 am (UTC)
I'm not comfortable considering any kind of prop detail like that canon.

And yeah, I could see her managing in four years. I have zero trouble with her brilliance, just trouble seeing that even a woman as brilliant as she is could go through too rapidly. Just the fact that she DID it, is pretty amazing. Most women end up getting run out of the field. The stats are very depressing.
Wednesday, October 17th, 2007 03:45 pm (UTC)
I know you and I are never going to agree on this, but I've finally got to speak up on the props as canon argument. LOL! Because details in the uniform they do show are checked with the military advisors they have (do they always listen, no...see Atlantis, but with SG-1 they do try to make it work).

Writers may not have a say in the props, but the writers of Stargate are also the producers, and they DO have say in the final product of the show. Some to a higher degree than others, I'll definitely grant you, but I don't dismiss a prop out of hand because it's all part and parcel of the final product.

The Shroud uniform stars was a blooper for sure, but there's been bloopers in dialogue too (see how many years Jacob's had a symbiote or calling Jack's homemade ZPM "Asgard technology"). I don't necessarily dismiss any/all props as canon just because it's not "stated out loud" in the show.

As for Sam having issues as a woman and getting her doctorate in the early 90s as opposed to the 1960s? I do agree it stretches credulity. But
Wednesday, October 17th, 2007 03:53 pm (UTC)
They ditched their military advisors quite a few seasons ago.
Wednesday, October 17th, 2007 04:31 pm (UTC)
I do think you're being a bit sweeping, here. :) Not everything that is a prop warrants automatic dismissal.

Yes, props do get messed up on occasion. And yes, the writers tend to leave vague phrases like "backdrop of schematics for honking big ship" in the scripts. But some things have been readily uniform (pardon the pun) year after year; and just as I accept the prop of Daniel's glasses, I accept other things, too.

YMMV, and apparently does. We'll have to agree to disagree on this one. :)
Wednesday, October 17th, 2007 04:41 pm (UTC)
And I can live with that. ;-) I do see the reasoning behind your stance and I can respect it. I just happen to put more importance on other aspects. I think we're probably only disagreeing on the matter of about four years or so. Ultimately, TPTB have left it oddly ambiguous given the solid ages given for the three guys. It drives me NUTS! :-);-)
Monday, October 22nd, 2007 11:46 am (UTC)
I got the impression from those that she *had* been trained as an Air Force jet pilot (when being the question).

Assuming that flight school in Sam's time was like it was in 2001/2002, she was trained as a fighter pilot while in flight school. My cousin went through more recently and all of the pilots were trained in both types of aircraft before being assigned into either "fighter" or "bomber" tracks for their career.

I agree that they're trying to shove too many major accomplishments into too short a time period. They do it for all of the characters except Teal'c and I find it quite annoying. I think, though, it's a common problem with television.
Monday, October 22nd, 2007 11:27 am (UTC)
I'm butting in here late since I'm just now getting around to reading all of the comments. My cousin completed her Air Force flight school relatively recently so I have some info as to how it was in 2001/2002. The Air Force trained all of its pilots in both fighters AND bombers during flight school. After flight school, the pilots are assigned into either bomber pilot or fighter pilot tracks. Once in a track, a pilot may change aircraft but not type of plane. The only exception is for the pilots of the Stealth Bomber who, owing to the weirdness of required hours in the air and limits on how many Stealth flights they can make, have to have a second plane type and *they* get to fly both fighters and the Bomber. :)

So, it's possible that Sam was tracked into bombers but she would have been trained to do both. Assuming they hadn't changed it up in the time between when Sam would have been there and the time my cousin was.
Tuesday, October 16th, 2007 08:49 pm (UTC)
"The writers of SG1 didn't think too clearly". Pause for hysterical laughter. Change that comment to "the writers of SG1 didn't think." and you'd be nearer the mark.
Tuesday, October 16th, 2007 08:53 pm (UTC)
I can pretend to be polite, now can't I? :)