February 2024

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728 29  

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Tuesday, October 16th, 2007 07:31 pm
There was considerable discussion in the comments section of the Sam Carter edition regarding Sam's actual age. If you're interested in reading the details that lead to the final conclusion (the screencap from Entity doesn't work, but Sam is still younger than Daniel), this link will take you directly to the new analysis.

And thanks, Codger. :)
Wednesday, October 17th, 2007 02:23 am (UTC)
Wow. And people told me I was ridiculously fast to do my Master's in 1.5 years...(as in, "you can't do it that fast! nobody gets a Master's that quickly!" "but, look, see the list of requirements? I've completed them" ".....oh....")

Is there assuming starting with a Master's or starting with a Bachelors? Because, really truly, in the sciences (and I firmly believe Sam would have gone to a Top Tier grad school) starting with a bachelor's that quick is almost impossible - with a lot of dedication and a lot of luck, three is just barely believable.
Wednesday, October 17th, 2007 02:32 am (UTC)
I would think they're talking about three years post graduate (i.e. post Bachelor of Science). Heh, as you've seen, it's a real person.

I got a doctorate in three years...okay, it was a professional non-sciencey doctorate that's supposed to take only three-four years. ;-) [/random mutterings]
Wednesday, October 17th, 2007 03:46 am (UTC)
I'm just going to keep reeling. Don't mind me :)
Wednesday, October 17th, 2007 02:59 am (UTC)
Because, really truly, in the sciences (and I firmly believe Sam would have gone to a Top Tier grad school) starting with a bachelor's that quick is almost impossible - with a lot of dedication and a lot of luck, three is just barely believable.

It really, really depends on where you go. I know of one place in particular that you can get a Masters in 1 year, but that's doing some very interesting backflips. (I'm talking Science or Engineering degrees, here.) From that program, getting all of grad school in 3 years (meaning 2 on PhD) is conceivable, but even your peers will tell you you're insane (and that's not even dealing with crazy politics).
Wednesday, October 17th, 2007 03:50 am (UTC)
Oh, 1 year masters are not all that uncommon (though terminal masters in the sciences are more common for 2-3 years). But there are so many hoops for a PhD and so much is luck with getting access to instruments and having experiments work and getting enough papers through the review process and published and getting your thesis written and defended and...it just takes time.

So, yeah, 3 is possible provided you work really really really hard and are magnificently lucky.
(I know when I was applying - in chemistry where you don't bother with masters if you're getting a PhD usually - Northwestern made a big deal that 4.5 years was common there because it was shorter than most schools)
*shrugs*
Sam = SMART
Wednesday, October 17th, 2007 03:53 am (UTC)
Sam = SMART

QED. :)
Wednesday, October 17th, 2007 02:57 pm (UTC)
Sam = SMART

Hee hee! Problem solved!